Skip to content
Explore a collection of reflective essays and personal stor…

Tetris Didn't Succeed at The Game Awards — A New Category May Address This Issue

Each time a significant honors show nears, there’s always a clamor for the addition of new categories to recognize underappreciated efforts and satisfy the spirits of followers with niche passions.

My colleague made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. The same goes for board games, this being a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance if I try to elbow in front because like all blinkered fanatics, I possess a compelling case backing this proposal is the most urgent and significant. Here's the proposal: It's essential to create a category for puzzle games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and it will always generate discussions concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason movie academies steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise in the world of gaming, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.

For the full spectrum of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

Leading game ceremonies offer these award types recognizing Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these award types successfully include many game types, and you can find room for numerous titles.

This doesn't apply to logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere to accommodate them. Think about these outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: structural challenges in a particular game, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles from additional release. Which classification works within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

Acknowledgment Issues

Many instances occur excellent brain-teasers launched regularly without proper recognition in entertainment awards, if they accidentally match classification types such as Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested independent game categories.

  • A renowned logic title got overlooked in any category during that awards season
  • Another imaginative release missed out that year
  • Well-received sorting experience got ignored recently
  • Just some puzzle games managed to sneak into independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often compact experiences, however the design in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as most popular titles in the world continuing this trend for an extended period.

The legendary block-stacking game challenges famous sandbox experiences for the title of most purchased experience; it also contends as greatest title ever. Puzzle games are foundational to the art of video games, and engaging across multiple categories.

The Solution and Justification

Logic titles wouldn't face that issue. One could readily select a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these are games without proper classification at major gaming awards. Logic title developers function at the hard edge of video game design, producing among most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Just like cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. We shouldn't delay generations.

About the author

Daniel Hendricks

A passionate writer and life coach dedicated to empowering others through mindset shifts and practical advice.

Reflective Rambles

Type to search articles.